An Analysis of Two Different Models of Civil-Military Relations: The Case of Turkey

Abstract

This article analyzes Turkish civil-military relations with the help of two different models of civil-military relations (separation and concordance) in order to bring a new perspective to the analysis of civil-military relations. The article begins with a short review of the theoretical framework of the separation and concordance models, followed by a brief history of four military interventions that occurred in Turkey in 1960, 1971, 1980, and 1997. The article will then analyze Turkish civil-military relations through the separation and concordance models in an attempt to decide which model would be more appropriate to explain the Turkish case. It reaches the conclusion that the concordance model is more appropriate than the separation model to serve that purpose. However, the concordance model has some methodological weaknesses, requiring modification in order to properly analyze the case of Turkey.

Keywords

Civil-Military Relations, Military Guardianship, Separation Model, Concordance Model, Turkish Civil-Military Relations

Citation

Uluçakar, Mustafa and Çağlar, Ali, “An Analysis of Two Different Models of Civil-Military Relations: The Case of Turkey”, International Relations, Volume 14, No. 55, 2017, pp. 41-57.

Affiliations

• Mustafa ULUÇAKAR, Dr., Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Hacettepe University
• Ali ÇAĞLAR, Prof. Dr., Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Hacettepe University