Worlding the Study of Normative Power: Assessing European and Chinese Definitions of the “Normal”

Abstract

This study contributes to the nascent worlding of the study of normative power by undertaking a parallel assessment of Normative Power Europe (NPE) and Normative Power China (NPC). There seems to have been a qualitative change in the EU’s and China’s international standing. While in the immediate post-Cold War period the EU was asserting its ability to set the range of legitimate international behavior and China appeared to be a reactive adopter of such norms, in recent years China is positioned as a normative entrepreneur and the EU’s ability has been challenged both in Europe and internationally. This study claims that such change in fortunes is not merely a result of recent developments, but pivots on the distinct repertoires of NPE and NPC – acquis communautaire for the EU and guanxi for China. The acquis communautaire suggests a “rule- based” framework for setting what passes for “normal” in global life, while guanxi offers a “relational” one. Such distinct points of departure have led to the evolution of distinct concepts and practices of normative power. The comparative study of NPE and NPC concludes by drawing attention to the nascent struggle for recognition of normative powers in global life.

Keywords

Acquis Communautaire, Normative Power China, Normative Power Europe, Guanxi

Citation

Kavalski, Emilian and Cho, Young Chul, “Worlding the Study of Normative Power: Assessing European and Chinese Definitions of the “Normal””, Uluslararasi İliskiler, Vol. 15, No. 57, 2018, pp. 49-65, DOI: 10.33458/uidergisi.518042

Affiliations

• Emilian Kavalski, Li Dak Sum Chair Professor, China-Eurasia Relations and International Studies, University of Nottingham Ningbo
• Young Chul Cho, Assoc. Prof. Dr., School of International Studies, Chonbuk National University